On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:02 PM, James Adcock <jimad@msn.com> wrote:
Is this "academic work" useful? Nope.
Right, and James Adcock is the final arbitrator of what academic work is useful or not. You've yet to explain why someone who wants to give a semantically marked up version to Project Gutenberg should be attacked, what immoral crime they've committed.
And you cannot use the book in the university's library anymore either -- because they dispose of the physical copies once they have digitized them.
Never have I seen them do that a book they've semantically analyzed. They've scanned books and disposed of them; perhaps you should object to anyone scanning books because someone has done that in the past. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.