On 2012-11-28, Lee Passey wrote:
On 11/26/2012 10:22 AM, Jon Hurst wrote:
I am intending to do the cross-checking with #84 at some point over the next month or so, so I'll send any errata once I'm done.
I wouldn't bother. . . .
By cross-checking I mean using #84 to polish #41445, not the other way round; I agree #84 is, as Don puts it, unassailable. I haven't done any work on #41445 yet beyond wrapping the submitted utf-8 file using P3 as a template. I really just wanted to harvest this particularly low hanging and tasty fruit before it disappeared from DP, and I want to get it into the #41445 fileset to make sure #41445 does not itself become unassailable.
Another simplistic page viewer (which needs some serious debugging) for Frankenstein can be found at http://www.ebookcoop.net/ebookcoop/ (registration required, but any bogus data will do because I'm not yet doing any validation). So far, only seems to work on Firefox, and I haven't taken the time to figure out the vagaries of other browsers.
The viewer was just a 10 minute hack so Greg could see what files I was wanting to upload. I'm not for one second proposing that PG uses it! A scan versus "line synched text" viewer would be a very nice thing to have at PG -- it would certainly save a lot of time hunting for errata references -- but kind of a lot would have to happen before that could become even a vague possibility. On 2012-11-28, Greg Newby wrote:
I'm attaching the posted message (hopefully it will pass through the email distribution intact).
Thanks Greg. I'll email Al and see what he wants to do. Regards Jon