jim thinks he can abuse me, and then ask me for a favor. ha!
I will point out that you asked me for a favor, namely a version of my "page images" with the linebreaks automatically re-introduced (something you keep claiming year after year is not possible) and then when I provided that to you, you in turn used that to abuse me, claiming that what I created for you, at your request, shows lots of bugs in what I submitted to PG, but are not willing to present the evidence to that effect.
download my text, and his text, and do the comparison, and test the diffs against his scan-set, and give him the "bug list".
I already did this "cross-versioning" against 76, and I don't see a great benefit in doing again against BB's version. But, if someone wants to take him up on the offer, go for it.
first, you can choose anyone reasonable as referee, who will hold the money from each of us, and rule on errors. (referee will, of course, promise to be totally impartial.)
You are repeating a rhetorical approach which Mitt Romney used "to great effect" during the debates. I have a simple counter-suggestion: If you want to contribute something useful to PG or this forum, then please do so. If not, then at least stop calling other people names.