rome?  burning?  what?

this "debate" isn't rome burning.

it's more akin to a marshmallow roast.

and it's not even a "debate" either.

that would imply that arguments are
moving in both directions, and -- as we
have seen -- jim seems to be incapable
of backing up anything that he has said.

-bowerbird

p.s.  while you were wasting time watching
the superbowl, roger frank was busy at work:
>   http://www.pgdp.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=738179#738179