30 Jan
2012
30 Jan
'12
12:25 a.m.
On 1/27/2012 12:48 PM, James Adcock wrote:
Lee>For example, let's start by agreeing to a few ground rules:...
LOL, are you serious, or are you only putting forth this set of "ground rules" as a hypothetical example ... or as a joke???
I'm as serious as a heart attack. The problem was to build a system where we could both contribute to a single text while each maintaining our own unique work flows. I suggested three rules that would allow us to do just that if we both agreed to the rules. Can you put forth any reason why adherence to these three rules would not permit simultaneous editing, or is ridicule your only form of argument?