On 9/18/2012 10:37 AM, Greg Newby wrote:
I don't remember your proposal specifically, but most proposals for improvements actually involve one or two things:
1) Telling people what they can no longer do (i.e., limiting choices), or
This is completely stuff and nonsense. Many of us have offered to help fix the existing problems in the existing corpus and have been told by the WWers and the Webmaster that somehow fixing problems in the existing corpus is somehow going to make PG go to hell in a handbasket. So, contrary to what you are saying Greg, it is *PG* who is telling people what they are not allowed to do. *PG* is telling volunteers they are not allowed to fix problems in the existing corpus. That right is being reserved exclusively by the WWers and the Webmaster -- except that they are in reality simply being the "dog guarding the straw" and the problems in the existing corpus ARE NOT being fixed.