At 11:17 AM 11/10/2004, you wrote:
Alev Akman writes:
Physical properties of the "original print work" like number of pages, size of the book, illustrations, etc.
How can this be mandatory? We've got a few composite books, that don't have a single print analogue, and many books where it would be hard or arbitrary to find an edition to get this information from.
I was speaking for our future records. I am aware that some of our files are even compilations of various additions. Hopefully we are getting away from works obtained that way, maybe even redoing them. If we want dependable works, we should be able to prove our source. No more chickening out for copyright reasons. Part of the reason PG does not have the power it should with the libraries is that the information required for citation purposes are a mishmash. We should be ready to present the best replicate of the work at hand and the information that goes with it. Alev.
-- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/listinfo.cgi/gutvol-d
--- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/2004
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/2004