Both sites support versioning, checkin/checkout, diffing, and most
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Keith J. Schultz <schultzk@uni-trier.de> wrote:
Hi Don,You pretty well sum up what is wrong at PG.You begin by describing what a user can do that is thetool offered for editing to the user. Simple and idiot proof.What you have forgotten is that the to with its user friendly interfaceis actually muscling databases and vcs-system behind the scenes.I have not forgotten. I write those kinds of backend software. Two of themare the ones used at DP-Itsly and eb.tbicl.org. One is loosely based onDP. The other is based on plain-vanilla wordpress and I can give you anaccount to edit any of the EB articles using any of the various wp editors,including RST, markdown, and the customized one I'm using with myown toolbar on it. I'm thinking about integrating anthologize to supportmultiple output formats, including epub and pdf.One is 100% custom software except for phpbb3 (just like DP.) Theother is 95% OTS software, 4% OSS pluginis for wordpress, and1% custom configuration software.The difference is that I start from user requirements and let themdetermine which tools to use on the backend. I'm extremely frustratedhere because no one seems to want to talk about user requirementsand everyone is eager to talk about their favorite technology..