Andrew Sly <sly@victoria.tc.ca> writes:
I question if the use of a series number as suggested below is an ideal approach.
I believe it is intended for a smaller number of items which are intentionally published as a series.
I'd suggest that the closest thing to PG etexts numbers in a traditional research library, would be accession numbers (as commonly used for microforms)
I used Series because The Early English Text Society publications are cataloged as a series and this was the closest thing I have found to the PG etext numbers. This is from the LOC: Series: Early English Text Society (Series). Original series ; 10, [etc.] 830 _0 |a Early English Text Society (Series). |p Original series ; |v 10, [etc.] I understand that the PG etext numbers are not a concious planned series but I still think it works.... b/ -- Brad Collins <brad@chenla.org>, Bangkok, Thailand