
21 Jun
2005
21 Jun
'05
7:16 p.m.
it's been one month since my post about "detecting headers", in response to jon noring's "challenge" in that specific regard. in case you've forgotten, here's a quick recap: big and bold. that's what headers look like. conspicuous. real hard to miss. easy to find. as i said last month, i have developed a 30-item checklist. that's how many ways a header can make itself conspicuous. but the main way -- by far -- is simply to be big and/or bold. so it's time now for part 2. but first, any questions? don't be shy, step right up, because headers are the first step toward detecting all types of things. (which is why we need to discuss them in some more detail.) -bowerbird