Perhaps one point is not clear. TEI and RST are both "single source" options. That is, a volunteer submits only *one* file, and all others are generated from it. --Anderew On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Jim Adcock wrote:
Just because you were not aware of RST being used on PG does not meean that it has been "hidden" from you.
You haven't addressed the issue. WHY is "PG" allowing "RST" and "Tei" to bypass the requirement to submit one and only one version of HTML while telling the rest of us submitters that we are not allowed to "submit" alternate versions for "EPUB" nor "MOBI" ?
There are no "tool chain" issues here. A submitter could just say to PG "This HTML is for big browsers, this HTML is for EPUB, and this HTML is for MOBI." Or PG could allow us to submit one HTML with conditional compilation statements, even using the CPP for * sake, and then generate *useful* versions of the "big browser HTML", "EPUB HTML", and "MOBI HTML" from that one submitted HTML that includes the conditional compilation statements.