frank said:
>   Even that number is a misinterpretation

thanks for clearing that up for us, frank...

it's clear that google has gotten their legs under them
in regard to doing the scanning.  let's hope that they'll
get their quality-control under control very soon too...

it is important to keep in mind that 100,000 books is
<1% of the 10.5 million (or more) they'll do eventually;
it's understandable if the process isn't up to speed yet.

-bowerbird