ok, that post i just sent, labeled "008", should be "009".

sorry about that...

***

keith said:
>   Sure BB's attitude is sometimes very tiresome !

my persistence demonstrates my "attitude" is even-keeled.

so if anything makes you "tired", that would be my tenacity.


>   He also, has had often a very bad choice of expression

you guys seem to forget that the future will have _hindsight_,
which is 20-20.  so the cyberarchaeologists down the line will
know that i was right all along, and they will correctly surmise
that my "very bad choice of expression" is a simple recitation of
the facts, related in a tone as mundane as reading the tax code.
the consistency of this tone -- over years -- indicates it is calm.


>   but after some many years
>   have you not learned to
>   ignore it for what it is!

if that's what you "learned", then you will indeed be seen by
those future cyberarchaeologists as very dense school-kids...


>   Heh, when he gets nasty, it truly shows that
>   he has no true argument that  is decently valid.
>   So he provokes, provokes ….

again, 20-20.  remember?  history is written by the winners.

i "provoke" nothing.  your reactions are _your_ responsibility.
it's spelled out, very clearly, here on page 42 of the tax code...

-bowerbird
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d