On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:59:00 -0500, "N Wolcott" <nwolcott@dsdial.net> wrote:
| It occurred to me that if there are not too many xxx portions of the diary, | then under the "fair use" doctrine one could write a "scholarly article" on | the topic of "editorial squeamishness" and include the referenced
| as footnotes and publish it in a scholarly place like the PG arachive??
I don't understand why there should be any problems with xxx portions. Or indeed why you thought it necessary to use xxx. Nowadays absolutely anything goes, a bit of sex does not cause any
The problem with the xxx portions is that they are only available in the copyrighted version of the diaries circa 1970. Since the Mynors-Bright versions indicate where the cuts were made, one could easily marry the additions with the original. Hence the need to use the U.S. "fair use" doctrine if it still exists. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Fawthrop" <hyphen@hyphenologist.co.uk> To: "Project Gutenberg Volunteer Discussion" <gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 1:26 PM Subject: Re: [gutvol-d] Pepys' birthday passages problems
whatsoever, in the UK at least.
-- Dave F
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/listinfo.cgi/gutvol-d