Looking at the headers from the most recent spam, this looks trivially easy to remedy by just implementing spamhaus PBL and/or blocking delivery from dynamic IPs. (see http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=93.142.249.19) I suppose the real question is why has it not... Received: from device.lan (93-142-249-19.adsl.net.t-com.hr [93.142.249.19]) by pglaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ABB2438; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 93.142.249.19(helo=kxcogak.mpotgsorh.org) by device.lan with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMHNE-3026ed-9X for gutvol-d@pglaf.org; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:36:35 +0100 -- Alex Buie Network Coordinator / Server Engineer KWD Services, Inc Media and Hosting Solutions +1(703)445-3391 +1(480)253-9640 +1(703)919-8090 abuie@kwdservices.com On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:17 PM, <Bowerbird@aol.com> wrote:
-bowerbird
p.s. on another front, distributed proofreaders just installed a "code of conduct". i guess misconduct over there is rampant.
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d