11 Jul
2006
11 Jul
'06
1:15 a.m.
In article <20060710154059.1A38E9EEE3@ws6-2.us4.outblaze.com>, Joshua Hutchinson <joshua@hutchinson.net> writes
How is it that the OCLC can enforce such a claim when the DDS was first written in 1870 (according to their website)? Shouldn't it be out of copyright and therefore open for anyone to use?
Simply using the DDS does not necessarily require making a copy of any DDS specification. To give an analogy. You don't breach copyright by following the diet presented a diet book. -- Philip Baker