jim said:
> I go to PG. I open any
> of the txt files in firefox.
> Q: Is the result something
> in practice that is
> useful to actually read?
> A: No it is not.
> It is "too unwieldy"
> to try to read
> PG txt files this way.
you'll need to tell us _why_
the .txt files are not "useful"
for you to read, so we can
evaluate what you're saying.
for instance, i find lines that
are up-to-80-characters-long
are simply too wide for me...
i like lines that are shorter...
much shorter... ;+)
-bowerbird
p.s. but the point of the
point that i was making is
that the maximum number
of machines that can show
an e-text is obtained _if_
you pre-wrap the lines...
if you have an argument
against _that_ point,
you would be on-topic...