my versions of "alice in wonderland" are up now. the z.m.l. text-file is at:
http://snowy.arsc.alaska.edu/bowerbird/alice01/alice01/alice01.zml
a representative .html file:
http://snowy.arsc.alaska.edu/bowerbird/alice01/alice01/alice01.html
i believe the .html version is as good as any you'll find on the net. (there are a _lot_ of .html versions of alice all around cyberspace. which is why i was amazed project gutenberg doesn't have one...) but please do feel free to give feedback about what might be wrong; i assure you i can take it. (even if i don't happen to agree with it...) because i used only a bare minimum of tags (appended to this post), i expect that this .html version would be fine for generating versions for the rocketbook, ereader, mobipocket, and the other p.d.a programs. so the question now is, if we can generate an .html version, as well as all the other versions stemming from the plain-text file, why do x.m.l.? david moynihan over at blackmask.com proved that _one_person_ could keep up with all the files being posted, converting each text-file (which he had to rework slightly) into a half-dozen different formats. in other words, the _promise_ that x.m.l. will give different versions -- which is, as yet, unproven, i must remind you -- has already been _realized_ -- for 15,000+ e-texts -- using the _plain-text_ version! so take a good hard look at the plain-text version i have just posted, and then take a good hard look at the various x.m.l. versions around, and decide for yourself which version _you_ would rather maintain... -bowerbird p.s. tags used in my .html file: [p][/p] [p id="..."][/p] [a href="#..."][/a] [br /] [hr /] [img src] [i][/i] [pre][/pre] [center][/center] [ul][/ul] [h1][/h1] [h2][/h2] [h3][/h3] [h4][/h4] [small][/small] [html][/html] [head][/head] [title][/title] [style][/style] [body][/body]