The Supreme Counts finds "The Law" is not subject to copyright, including annotations, in the case of Georgia's actions, which invited LexusNexus markups, and then tried to say that others couldn't use that law because it was then (supposedly) subject to copyright.  Supreme Count finds that "it is all The Law" not subject to copyright.

Not to imply that I know how much anyone can extend this line of Supreme Court conclusion to the really annoying issue of law publishers putting one or another of their forms of marks on "The Law" -- and then claiming that they own copyright on the entire results.

But maybe Greg knows the answer ;-)

Jim Adcock