josh said:
>   Personally, I think our TEI -> PDF output looks a lot better.

i'll take a look.  (i just explained why i admired the .pdf output
of finereader.  given that it takes absolutely _no_ work at all,
being fully automatic, i think the job that it does is _excellent_.
but no, that doesn't mean i admire it in an _absolute_ sense;
in addition to the scannos, its font recognition can be wacky.)

i'll assume you're open to feedback on these, and i'll give it,
so let me know if you'd prefer not to have any...

some of the .html-books that have come out of d.p. lately
have looked really good.  unfortunately, given the problems
of viewing an e-book inside of a browser, there are too many
situations where the beauty is hidden by browser-based flaws.

(probably the biggest thing that irritates me is when a picture
is split across a window, and i have to nudge it up or down to
view it in its entirety.  as a constant bugaboo, it's maddening.)

but aside from the shortcomings of the browser,
i'd say the people at d.p. are doing great work...

-bowerbird