15 Oct
2012
15 Oct
'12
3:47 p.m.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:18 AM, James Adcock <jimad@msn.com> wrote:
PG needs to make sure that what they publish represents "typesetting" and NOT "semantic analysis." PG should speak out strongly against all people and all communities which engage in copyfraud -- including much of the TEI "scholarly" community.
Those two sentences have no connection. You do not further the cause of the public domain by attacking certain derivative works that some people find useful. If people need semantically analyzed works, then they should make semantically analyzed works. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.