21 Aug
2005
21 Aug
'05
6:40 p.m.
David A. Desrosiers wrote:
Besides wanting to celebrate the first XML posting ;) ... I'm also looking for contructive criticism. What doesn't look right? What problems do you see with the results?
Other than the unicode changes, what is the difference between 16523-0.txt and 16523-8.txt? They appear to contain identical content.
16523-0.txt is UTF-8 encoding 16523-8.txt is Latin-1 encoding 16523-7.txt is ASCII encoding. The content should otherwise be identical.