In a message dated 12/15/2005 8:26:29 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, sl y@victoria.tc.ca writes: Personally, I have no problem with keeping information about the source a pg text was derived from, as long as it is clear that is information about the _source text_ not the Project Gutenberg digital resource. (For instance, there are places where we call a book "Third edition"--when it is our first; or mention a lccn which applies to the source, but not the PG text. From a library sciences point of view this could be said to make as much sense as saying that a PG text has 416 pages, because that is what the source had.) --and that would be impossible to say accurately, because how many "pages" a PG text has depends on what size type the reader is using. I agree with all you have said here. Anne