lee said:

I note that Bowerbird did not comment on this problem, and when it comes to fault-finding one can usually rely on Bowerbird.

well, we usually call it "quality control" in my neck of the woods, i kid you not. :+) but yeah, i'm usually pretty good at it. (and i can take it, as well as dish it out.) i _did_ fall down on the job yesterday, however, by inexplicably failing to notice -- in firefox -- that text was not styled... emphasized text was marked in the x.m.l., but it wasn't displayed in any distinct way. so once you get that problem fixed, and you get the images displayed ok, your cutting-edge fourth-quarter-2005 x.m.l. solution that only runs in the new (bloated) browsers will begin to approach the capabilities .html gave us back in 1997. but hey, as long as _you_ are having fun, what does it really matter, eh? :+) -bowerbird