re: [gutvol-d] .tei repostings and evaluation of their .pdf versions
marcello said:
This is my authority. Now I'd like to know yours.
if you think knuth would defend your .pdf's as they are, you are seriously deluded. if you don't care if typographers would laugh at your output, why should i? the worse your stuff looks, the better mine looks in comparison. but you're not fooling anyone. once people have forgotten that i was the one who pointed out the pimples, you'll fix 'em. have a nice day. -bowerbird
Bowerbird@aol.com wrote:
This is my authority. Now I'd like to know yours.
if you think knuth would defend your .pdf's as they are, you are seriously deluded.
You did not answer my question. What autority can you bring in to support your claim that paper books use variable leading "almost exclusively"? Or should I just be contented that *you* said it.
if you don't care if typographers would laugh at your output, why should i?
At least its only typographers who laugh at me. -- Marcello Perathoner webmaster@gutenberg.org
participants (2)
-
Bowerbird＠aol.com -
Marcello Perathoner