Hi, Mr. McLean does have a good point. And there is enough activity on this thread to indicate great interest. Great interest usually results in people doing something (like volunteering to help). It's just, no one wants to start the cataloging by subject, it seems mostly, because we lack consensus on which system to use, or whether to start our own. To decide on that, apparently will take a meeting of minds. Dare I use the "C" word? Committee? On Aug 28, 2006, at 2:00 PM, gutvol-d-request@lists.pglaf.org wrote:
1. Re: Re: Search by subject for ebooks? (Wallace J.McLean)
The proofreading is distributed... the reorganization of the file system was done on a piecework basis... why not the cataloguing?
Whatever works, as long as a consensus or agreement on a system to use is reached. A committee is a good way to help us decide what to do. Jared Christa & Jay Toser wrote on 28/08/2006, 11:01 PM:
Hi,
Mr. McLean does have a good point. And there is enough activity on this thread to indicate great interest. Great interest usually results in people doing something (like volunteering to help).
It's just, no one wants to start the cataloging by subject, it seems mostly, because we lack consensus on which system to use, or whether to start our own.
To decide on that, apparently will take a meeting of minds. Dare I use the "C" word? Committee?
On Aug 28, 2006, at 2:00 PM, gutvol-d-request@lists.pglaf.org wrote:
1. Re: Re: Search by subject for ebooks? (Wallace J.McLean)
The proofreading is distributed... the reorganization of the file
system was done on a piecework basis... why not the cataloguing?
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/listinfo.cgi/gutvol-d
participants (2)
-
Christa & Jay Toser -
Jared Buck