re: [gutvol-d] Categorizing PG content

andrew said:
Any extensive discussions might be better placed on the gutcat list.
extensive discussions on this topic were already held here on gutvol-d. why go through it all again? and again and again and again? if you don't put this stuff on a wiki, you're just on a merry-go-round... it stifles participation when contributions regularly go down the drain. -bowerbird

Thanks for trying to help here bb. What I'm doing here is not the same as unfocused, meandering exchange of possible ideas you can often find on a mailing list. (which is sometimes a good thing to have). Instead, I'm trying to move ahead with something that will actually contribute to making PG content more accessible to many people out there. I've already discussed this with Marcello, and we could already "have this stuff on a wiki", but I'm overly cautious, and wanted to get input from other people, that might help implement it in a better way, and also give people an idea of what's coming. Andrew On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 Bowerbird@aol.com wrote:
andrew said:
Any extensive discussions might be better placed on the gutcat list.
extensive discussions on this topic were already held here on gutvol-d. why go through it all again? and again and again and again?
if you don't put this stuff on a wiki, you're just on a merry-go-round...
it stifles participation when contributions regularly go down the drain.
-bowerbird
participants (2)
-
Andrew Sly
-
Bowerbird@aol.com