Honestly, I see an easy compromise here. As long as a conformant TEXT file and a conformant HTML file show up with the XML file, I say post all three. Granted, right now we don't have a method for the WW'ers to verify the XML file is valid, so if you want to put a disclaimer to that effect in the file ... fine. But this way, the XML folks can get the catalog of texts they want and the process will be able to make incremental steps forward. Josh ----- Original Message ----- From: Karl Eichwalder <ke@gnu.franken.de> To: gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org Subject: [gutvol-d] Re: barriers to XML posting Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:21:54 +0200

Greg Newby <gbnewby@pglaf.org> writes:

...

Your claim that we need to start posting more stuff in XML in order to achieve the ** goal above does not make sense to me. I do not see the logic.

I am very interested in XML files. Please post them even if they look useless to you.

-- | ,__o | _-\_<, http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*) _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/listinfo.cgi/gutvol-d