keith said:
Why should I do that ? That is ban you from the list
that was a wink at the sordid history of this listserve. some time back, the pack-who-always-attacked-me became such a victim of its own group-think that it actually convinced itself that _i_ was the only reason that t.e.i. wouldn't work, like my mere presence had some kind of magical force that rendered t.e.i. moot. they tried to ban me here, but michael wouldn't have it. so they decided that if they set up a listserve elsewhere, and banned me from it in advance, they would succeed bringing about the great solution that i was subverting, and create the t.e.i. workflow project gutenberg needed. in other words, they were saying pretty much exactly what you proposed, keith. this was about 6 years ago. so they actually created that listserve. it went nowhere. this listserve has been repeating its own history forever. -bowerbird
Hi BB, I am aware of your misfortunes. I am also fully aware of there and back again. Yet, your suggestion that I might even think of banning someone, and in light of your remarks towards me as possibly not being a "good America" or just being a "good German" and further more implication of me not being for "free speech" seems to form a pattern. Whether intensional or not, it does not matter. P.G. seems to be working on something new. At least it is a move in the right direction. regards Keith. Am 17.12.2010 um 20:20 schrieb Bowerbird@aol.com:
keith said:
Why should I do that ? That is ban you from the list
that was a wink at the sordid history of this listserve.
some time back, the pack-who-always-attacked-me became such a victim of its own group-think that it actually convinced itself that _i_ was the only reason that t.e.i. wouldn't work, like my mere presence had some kind of magical force that rendered t.e.i. moot.
participants (2)
-
Bowerbird＠aol.com -
Keith J. Schultz