pride. and prejudice. incremental. improvement. .epub.
i went ahead and did a chopped-up version of an .epub of "pride and prejudice", so even that pathetic viewer-app from adobe can display it.
that goes with this earlier version:
greg, please enter both in your not-a-tournament. how's that coming along, anyway? *** and oh my goodness, what a headache .epub is... validation problems spring up left and right, and there's precious little authoritative documentation. i guess the 1% boys at the big publishing houses don't want all those 99% amateurs making books. they'd rather not have any competition, thank you. the sooner their .epub format dies, the happier i'll be. most of the time, i'd rather deal with .pdf than .epub, from the programming end, and that's saying a lot... speaking of .pdf, does anyone want me to make one? since nobody's looking at these files, i won't bother, _unless_ somebody actually requests it, specifically... -bowerbird
Hi BB, Both look o.k. Except for the TOC in prapr300. Proof of concept achieved regards Keith Am 10.02.2012 um 00:48 schrieb Bowerbird@aol.com:
i went ahead and did a chopped-up version of an .epub of "pride and prejudice", so even that pathetic viewer-app from adobe can display it.
that goes with this earlier version:
greg, please enter both in your not-a-tournament.
how's that coming along, anyway?
***
and oh my goodness, what a headache .epub is...
validation problems spring up left and right, and there's precious little authoritative documentation.
i guess the 1% boys at the big publishing houses don't want all those 99% amateurs making books. they'd rather not have any competition, thank you.
the sooner their .epub format dies, the happier i'll be.
most of the time, i'd rather deal with .pdf than .epub, from the programming end, and that's saying a lot...
speaking of .pdf, does anyone want me to make one?
since nobody's looking at these files, i won't bother, _unless_ somebody actually requests it, specifically...
-bowerbird _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
On 2/9/2012 4:48 PM, Bowerbird@aol.com wrote:
validation problems spring up left and right, and there's precious little authoritative documentation.
If you would like to post the list of validation errors, I would be happy to explain each and every one, and point you to the authoritative documentation.
participants (3)
-
Bowerbird＠aol.com -
Keith J. Schultz -
Lee Passey