"Banning the Burka" article
(Re-iterating the topic raised by Dave Fawthrop...) This week's issue of the PG newsletter (Part 1a) http://www.gutenberg.org/newsletter/archive/PGWeekly_2005_10_19_Part_1a.txt included an article entitled "Holland Banning The Burka?". Why? Does its inclusion further PG's mission of "encouraging the creation and distribution of eBooks"? -Michael Dyck
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Agreed. It's irrelevant to PG. Once again, I encourage (and I believe others do as well) Michael Hart to put articles and comments such as these in a separate blog or newsletter, but not in the official newsletter of PG. Sincerely Aaron Cannon At 05:26 PM 10/21/2005, you wrote:
(Re-iterating the topic raised by Dave Fawthrop...)
This week's issue of the PG newsletter (Part 1a) http://www.gutenberg.org/newsletter/archive/PGWeekly_2005_10_19_Part_1a.txt included an article entitled "Holland Banning The Burka?".
Why?
Does its inclusion further PG's mission of "encouraging the creation and distribution of eBooks"?
-Michael Dyck
_______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/listinfo.cgi/gutvol-d
- -- E-mail: cannona@fireantproductions.com Skype: cannona MSN Messenger: cannona@hotmail.com (Do not send E-mail to the hotmail address.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 Comment: Key available from all major key servers. iD8DBQFDWbtzI7J99hVZuJcRAsR9AJ4mLXOspW73BGt5n29aDHqBwcTJ+QCcCRg3 OaiXIJL4Qetdue/Br6iNPNo= =QFIg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Aaron Cannon -
Michael Dyck