RE: [gutvol-d] no, the problem is
bowerturkey:
there are some problems with the d.p. workflow -- some rather glaring ones, when you consider how many people are laboring under those flows,
Key issue, people are working. You (and I) are not. Go away or actually release that software you threatened to do some 2-3 years ago. Since I don't contribute, I usually keep my mouth closed. Oh, what's your USER ID over at DP, we could ruin a forum over there and you could brag about how many pages you proof. Greg, Enough already. Just kick his arse out of here.
--- Doug Schroeder <ds@dougschroeder.com> wrote:
bowerturkey:
there are some problems with the d.p. workflow -- some rather glaring ones, when you consider how many people are laboring under those flows,
Key issue, people are working. You (and I) are not.
Aside from the mudslinging, I thought I'd mention that the workflow at DP will be changing soon. Until now, books have done through two general proofing rounds. This is now being split into 2 pure proofreading rounds, and 2 formatting-and-final-overview rounds. This is because we're now processing books which require a lot of formatting, and we find that people find it difficult to concentrate both on proofreading and formatting. After this transition has been successfully completed, we will introduce further mini-rounds for specific content (Greek, tables, music, etc.) which requires specific talents to proofread. -- Jon Ingram __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
participants (2)
-
Doug Schroeder -
Jonathan Ingram