Re: [gutvol-d] Re: Line art (was Google Print vs. The Open Library vs. Projec...

25 Nov
2005
25 Nov
'05
6:13 p.m.
In a message dated 11/25/2005 5:43:05 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, prosfilaes@gmail.com writes: That's not true. Much of Dover's material is original, reprints of material still under copyright, or reworking of public domain material until the copyrighted material is hard to seperate from the public domain (the clip art books are a good example of this; they have a compilation copyright, and I suspect they've done enough cropping and cleaning on the art to claim a copyright on the pieces in many cases). Thanks for the clarification. Okay, we CAN'T use Dover. Anne
7134
Age (days ago)
7134
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Gutenberg9443@aol.com