starner said:

So does that mean you're going to stop pushing ZML on us?

pushing? that's a rather loaded term, don't you think? and inaccurate too. z.m.l. is a solution to problems with the library. i will be the person who implements that solution. i came here to _show_ you that solution, so if y'all were _smart_ enough to see it as such, y'all could help me with that implementation... but i didn't count any chickens before they were hatched, so it is no loss to me that y'all are unable to see clearly. i was always willing to implement the solution myself, and i still am. what _i_ got out of the whole deal was a much more detailed picture of how to make it happen, by virtue of having explained it some six ways to sunday. meanwhile, same rule as day one: the proof is in the pudding.

Or are you going to argue over the definition of the word "is" again?

what? -bowerbird