david garcia (dpname="donovan") said:

I'm surprised that no one has yet mentioned pandoc as a useful piece of kit.

i'm surprised you weren't already in my kill-filter, donovan. but you are now... :+) *** anyway... last week:

http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/private/gutvol-d/2011-December/008456.html last month:

http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2011-November/002390.html

http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2011-November/002392.html 6 months ago:

http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2011/06/my-monospaced-life/

1 year ago:

http://lists.pglaf.org/pipermail/gutvol-p/2010-July/000074.html

3 years ago:

http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/09/why-you-should-care-about-xml.html

5 years ago:

http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2007-January/000488.html i didn't bother to mention pandoc to you idiots because you were so convinced that light-markup wouldn't work, and willing to bet (and lose) all your credibility against it. *** also, since we're on the subject of pandoc once again, someone who wanted to win that $100 prize from lee could convert my .html output for "books and culture" into markdown and restructured-text, using pandoc... he has no credibility left. might as well take his cash too. -bowerbird