don said:

Seems like the original contributor could be presumed to have implicitly authorized, indeed welcomed, corrected versions as replacements, regardless of the magnitude of the resulting change.

don appears to have made a few errors there. so let me "fix" them for him.

seems like the original contributor could not be presumed to have authorized, let alone welcomed, so-called "corrected" versions as "replacements," regardless of the insignificance of any resulting changes.

there. now it's been "corrected" and "replaced". and perhaps don now sees why he was wrong... -bowerbird p.s. "look at the scan", you object. "what scan?", i ask. there is no scan. i repeat, there is no scan. none at all.