Alev Akman writes:

...

But it's not. A book that included part of the current PG title was published and printed then; but the PG title also includes various other publicationsthat weren't combined with it in book form.

I was just trying to make a point and give an example. I had no way of knowing what the publication date for the title in question was. Did I? : )

What point? It's obvious we're at cross purposes. The publication date had nothing to do with it. My point was that that data was wrong, because the PG book was a unique compliation of several original volumes; the fact that the publication date was wrong was a red herring. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm