re: [gutvol-d] Kevin Kelly in NYT on future of digital libraries

bruce said:
I have no idea how many books Google scanned published after 1922 which are probably PD because the copyright was apparently not renewed
it would be foolish for google to take the risk of showing books published after 1922. if even one had been renewed, it would become ammunition for the other side.
nor the number of books scanned even though the book is still under copyright.
we could extrapolate from the ratio of public-domain to copyrighted titles in the libraries, but that would assume that they aren't taking that into consideration, and they might well be. i believe they had said that they would concentrate on public-domain titles first. (or maybe that's just what michael _said_ they said.) at any rate, i'm happy to sit back and wait while they continue to do more scanning... -bowerbird

On Mon, 22 May 2006 Bowerbird@aol.com wrote:
bruce said:
I have no idea how many books Google scanned published after 1922 which are probably PD because the copyright was apparently not renewed
I seem to recall an earlier report from someone who did lots of searches for Google books and determined that 88% of them were published after 1922. Or at least were being treated as copyrighted books. mh

More. . .as for that 88% figure, I think that may have alluded to the number of books Google has at their potential disposal, rather than the number of those that have been scanned yet, or it may also take duplications into account. Sorry, been really busy, can't recall all the details. . . . mh
participants (2)
-
Bowerbird@aol.com
-
Michael Hart