On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Michael Lockey wrote:
I've been around long enough
that I can honestly say the quality of submissions from DP is much
higher than when individuals were doing all their own work, with no
checks except ad hoc. Naithless, PSTB have determined that quality and
Interesting argument. One that I might disagree with on some levels.
Some books, prepared by some people for PG have had a truly exceptional
quality, without going through the DP process.
Please; I would just like to make it clear that much excellent work HAS
been, and continues to be, published by individuals, and even works of
lesser quality can be the equivalent of (so-called) published books. I
don't think I've ever seen a book without errata, and some- including
best sellers- can be appalling. It'll be interesting to see how Mr.
Potter fares this time... No; I'm talking about the overall
performance; and not making any comparisons. Our mandate must simply
include continuous improvement.