Thanks for the message Gardner. I think what this helps make apparant is that once you get five people gathered together, you will have at least six different opinions on any given topic. :) I've rather curious to see how our various ideas about the possibilities for PG of Canada will (hopefully) converge together. Andrew On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Gardner Buchanan wrote:
For my part, I think I'd rather emulate PG-Australia in a few ways. Col has adopted a simple and functional header and a mercifully abridged trailer that I would sooner borrow than PG-USA's I also feel that his directory structure is more practical, not to mention sane.
Darryl indicated his preference for XML. While that sounds nice, I'd guess that he hasn't had any experience using Gutcheck on XML. I for one intend to continue to crank out plain text documents in the format PG-US and PG-AU commonly hold. I'd recommend that he has a go at marking up his first text - GWTW - into XML as a trial and see how that goes before committing to this path.
All that said, I hafta say that I am grateful that Darryl has taken the initiative on this. Thank you. When the time comes I think my cheque book will also thank you/PG-CA.