[posted] Re: bare mention of image filenames

[Bowerbird at aol.com]

david said:
>   we have had suggestions from others that 
>    the text files should have an indication of the images 
>    which are present in the accompanying html files

i have made a similar suggestion many times.

not so much to indicate the images that are
"in the accompanying html files", but rather
the images present _in_the_book_itself_...

i'm not sure i follow why ockerbloom believes
this is a bad practice.   it's common-sense to me.

of course, 30,000 e-texts in, it's kinda late in the game.
it's gonna take a dedicated scrapping effort to restore
all of the information that has been excluded thus far.

but i applaud the effort to start doing the right thing...

-bowerbird



**************
We found the real ‘Hotel California’ and the ‘Seinfeld’ 
diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. 
(http://www.whereitsat.com/#/music/all-spots/355/47.796964/-66.374711/2/Youve-Found-Where-Its-At?ncid=eml
cntnew00000007)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.pglaf.org/pipermail/posted/attachments/20090604/6d169378/attachment.txt>