anne said:
> I don't know why it was spurned, but
> I do know that he's posted a lot of
> stuff that is still in copyright and
> sooner or later lawyers are going to
> eat his lunch. As long as nobody could
> figure out who owned the copyright,
> that was okay, but now that courts have
> ruled on the owner, it's another matter.
i don't know anything about that.
i'm very supportive of people who will
have the guts to publish something and
take a chance at being dragged into court,
if they are making that thing _available_
when it was an orphan out of circulation.
but again, i don't know about blackmask,
so i don't know if that applies, or not...
-bowerbird
