That's real good news, Greg, especially if you're talking about flexibility on the DP side. 100% of the responsibility for evaluating and recommending changes to the DP process has been apparently relegated to the DP Board of Directors. Since you are one of the five directors, you're in the know if anyone is. Since you represent 20% of the horsepower responsible for coming up with those changes, I trust you've been busy. On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Greg Newby <gbnewby@pglaf.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:33:01PM -0800, Jim Adcock wrote:
... If PG were able to easily accept a txt file now and the html version (and other versions later) not only would readers get some books a year earlier, but we could probably save some efforts that die and get lost somewhere between txt complete and html complete. Why does posting have to happen "all at once" ???
It doesn't. In fact, "extracting" works from DP earlier was a big push I made a couple of years ago. At that time, such two stage (or other great-than-one stage) output was something that didn't fit well with the workflow. Maybe that's something that could be revisited.
It's important to not double the effort involved at the final posting phase (whitewashing) through such a two stage process. But there are several good ways of insuring this, which could be incorporated with the process.
There is definitely flexibility.
-- Greg _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d