It may take me a little while, but I'm happy to try and answer any questions you have about bookloupe... Ali. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015, at 06:30 PM, James Adcock wrote:
Huh. Not obvious to me what he is doing in bookloupe.
Jim.
*From:* gutvol-d [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] *On Behalf Of *Al Haines *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:37 PM *To:* 'Project Gutenberg Volunteer Discussion'; 'James Adcock' *Subject:* Re: [gutvol-d] Unicode UTF-8 Compatible Version of Gutcheck
I'd like to give it a try. Can you upload it somewhere? Or you can send me a copy as a zipped attachment.
And if you can mention the etext numbers of several of the files you tested it against, I can cross-check them with Gutcheck and Bookloupe (http://www.juiblex.co.uk/pgdp/bookloupe/index.html).
Al
-----Original Message----- *From:* gutvol-d [mailto:gutvol-d-bounces@lists.pglaf.org] *On Behalf Of *James Adcock *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:49 PM *To:* gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org *Subject:* [gutvol-d] Unicode UTF-8 Compatible Version of Gutcheck
I’ve created a Unicode UTF-8 Compatible Version of Gutcheck, calling it gutcheck_u -- if anyone wants to try it.
This was primarily an exercise in finding and changing 8-bit char coding dependencies to 16-bit widechar coding dependencies, but it did require some additional coding.
Currently it is a somewhat Windows-dependent implementation, so if you want to run it on another OS it would take a little bit of work.
I find it more pleasant to use if one’s development file format of choice is UTF-8, and/or if one are doing such things as left-handed / right-handed quotes.
Testing it on PG released files I am in fact finding a fair amount of left / right handedness errors that are not currently being discovered.
Let me know if you want to try it, same distribution terms as the original.
Jim Adcock
jimad@msn.com
_________________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d