How do you conclude I propose going back to anything? On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:53 PM, David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> wrote:
In terms of order-of-magnitude scalable growth, though, DP, for all its other benefits, is more like the problem than the solution. So new and different procedures need to be considered, not to replace DP, but to give more options to people who don't fit the DP work pattern.
You're complaining about scalable growth, and you propose that we go back to ways that didn't scale? I don't object to making the PG website more helpful, but no matter what you do for solitary producers, if they're ever a major supply of works for PG again, it will be because PG is dying.
-- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero. _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d