Your url is better than the one I had, and I found some documents. Here's a link to a representative case. http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/text/5506.xml It's whqt I would expect an XML document to look like. Does anyone think this is a markup we're likely to get DP proofers to adopt? There's a lot of markup for not much text - low signal/noise ratio. A lot of generic tags: <item>...</item> type stuff that's not encouraging. Is this a real candidate? On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> wrote:
I did start to browse through it. I didn't find anything that purported to be a catalog, or an offer of a url to download a text. If you know of one, please pass it along.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Carlo Traverso <traverso@posso.dm.unipi.it
wrote:
> "don" == don kretz <dakretz@gmail.com> writes:
don> Yup, Been through some of that. Good project don> descriptions. Lots of Best Practices. I haven't found one don> yet that will let me have a TEI document. (A few will let me don> buy a CD that *may* have one on it.)
Did you try the Oxford text archive, http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/ ? What they call XML is TEI, 2506 of them. I have seen many more from other sources.
Carlo _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d@lists.pglaf.org http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d