ok now, remember how i said that preprocessing is a _simple_ thing, typically with no need for a large set of checks that need to be done? on the current chunk of text i'm analyzing from rfrank's experiment, it looks like a dozen simple checks would've found 75% of the errors, right off the bat, with no need for a word-by-word proofing round... save the time and energy and _focus_ of your proofers: preprocess. -bowerbird