Re: choke-points on the internet

keith said:
I do understand the dynamics.
then why did you ask?
Yet, how wikiLeaks and their latest revelations are of concern to PG is beyond me.
then why did you say you understand the dynamics?
Please do not even reply. I do not really care.
ok, you don't care. fine. i _do_ care. so i will reply.
Do you think I expect an answer!
is that a question?
You do know what a rhetorical question is.
is that a statement? -bowerbird

So you are saying that wikileaks publication of US diplomatic wires are of interest to PG ! That the US is trying to do something about it is of interest about that fact is of interest to PG. C'Mon ! Quote all you want out of context. The facts remain. Yes, PG is interested in public domain books. Free internet, free speech, ... I never knew though PG is an activist group! Forget it. I am not interested in your political opinions which only have the o so slightest bearing on PG and its objectives. To say actually, none at all. regards Keith. Am 08.12.2010 um 01:07 schrieb Bowerbird@aol.com:
keith said:
I do understand the dynamics.
then why did you ask?
Yet, how wikiLeaks and their latest revelations are of concern to PG is beyond me.
then why did you say you understand the dynamics?
Please do not even reply. I do not really care.
ok, you don't care. fine. i _do_ care. so i will reply.
Do you think I expect an answer!
is that a question?
You do know what a rhetorical question is.
is that a statement?
participants (2)
-
Bowerbird@aol.com
-
Keith J. Schultz